after all the children were not

The affiliated high school of fudan HuangYuFeng also think Chinese top-tier teachers don't delete, delete, after all the children were not stupid, will not completely absorption; Plus, because the editor moralities, values in the teaching is economics-conflicts designation, this kind of books is still hard to delete clean. And as a unified, standardized, still be inferior to let in memory most vigorous stage student full-text read or back a back, "students to grow up completely according to cultural exchange-di zigui act is impossible."

Use "loss" to measure whether reading too utilitarianism

HuangYuFeng teacher thinks, for these traditional enlightenment books, need not raise or belittle. "these readings are with then social adaptation of the textbook, for children have moral requirements, and characters is very concise, let the children back some didn't harm."

WenZhong professor thinks "whole", etc in accordance with the embedded act, 90% classic to suffer ". This yellow teacher thinks, learning enlightenment books role is not "eat not to suffer", but can pass them to promote their own fix for, personality, "some values seem too lofty enough practical, but we can regard it as for good benchmarking. I might be hard to do, but I at least want to know that is right, good."